Hayeon Park
Prof. Kyle Brebner
IERW(03)
25 November 2015
Opposition to the Government-Designated History Textbooks
It is easy to delude themselves that they are familiar with Korean history if they are Korean. Many Koreans are proud of Korean history but most of them have only a little knowledge about the history. One of the reasons is that history is not a required subject in the school curriculum. Also there is no correct answer because there are various interpretations of history. The South Korean government has recently announced plans to issue new history textbooks in middle and high schools. While the government insists that they should teach only one history, the opposition parties, historians, and educational circles disapprove strongly of it. Opponents, who against making new history textbooks, present some problems. The major drawbacks of making government-designated history textbooks is a team organization of writers who make the sole history, a short period of the writing, and a narrative of the historical issues having a point of dispute.
One of the drawbacks about making the sole history is how to decide a team organization of writers who make the sole history. The government asserts that they have to make government-published textbooks to resolve unequal distribution of organizing a team of writers. Current authorized textbook allegedly are left leaning politically. So the Ministry of Education announced they would arrange writers encompassing all generations and make a compilation council composed of various careers like history, education, Korean linguistics and constitution scholars as well as parents and teachers. However, it is hard to create well-balanced organization of writers at this stage. There are more than a few people who are in the leading academic world of history and in-service professors of history dissent government-published textbooks itself. They expressed their will not to participate on national textbooks. It makes sure to organize well-balanced writers between the left and the right wings groups.
Another problem of making the sole history is a short period of the writing. The government plans to write the national history textbooks from this November to next November. They also want to distribute the textbooks on site in March, 2017. According to normal production period of textbooks, it usually takes two or three years. Their time, on the other hand, is only about one year including a team organization of writers, writing& review and modification. To apply new history books in classes of middle and high school from 2017, they have to reduce the process of review and modification drastically. It is likely to make just rough-and-ready without those processes.
One final drawback is a narrative of the historical issues having a point of dispute. The government would create the sole history of Korea. How are they able to weave various views of the history into one? Remaining politically neutral is really important for textbooks. There should be various ideological disputes to resolve. It risks distorting the textbooks fitting with the position of government. Also, students would fundamentally lose the opportunity to learn the history with their historical imagination arising from historical debates. The narrative of the historical issues in looking at only one aspect does not fit into the contemporary flow, which emphasizes diversity and creativity in the world supporting democracy and political freedom.
Most people point out that using government-designated history textbooks is a retrograde step for democracy. It would enforce uniformity of thoughts. The publication system of textbooks has changed from compilation by the state to official certification as democratization progresses. Returning to compilation by the state means returning to Park chung-hee’s regime which called the Yushin regime. Yushin government revised most constitution and Yushin’s dictatorial powers had taught standardized history. I think we could filter the errors enough, which the government insist, by compensating current official certification. Thus, Korean government must not determine the change toward making government-designated history textbooks hastily. If they should go forward with making the sole history textbooks, we would teach and enforce to memorize the history which we don’t even know whether it is real fact or not.